Skip to content
← About the project

One experiment · 80 seconds

A small burn. A different orbit.

Follow one change from a prediction to an executed maneuver and a numerical check. Start the timed tour or move through the steps at your own pace.

Circular orbit 400 kilometres above EarthEarthDashed: circularSolid: after burn
Positions come from the simulator. Playback compresses orbital time; Earth and orbit distances share a scale. The spacecraft marker is enlarged.

The question

Seeing Jupiter’s moons through my great-grandfather’s telescope made me want to see how orbits change over time. Here is one experiment from the sandbox: what happens when a spacecraft in a circular orbit gains 100 m/s?

Altitude now
400.0 km
Speed now
7.669 km/s
Burn at mission time 0
Planned · 100 m/s
Coast energy drift
0.00e+0
0 / 80 seconds

This tour uses its own example. Your existing sandbox plan is preserved.

Read the complete tour and numerical comparison

The question. Seeing Jupiter’s moons through my great-grandfather’s telescope made me want to see how orbits change over time. Here is one experiment from the sandbox: what happens when a spacecraft in a circular orbit gains 100 m/s?

A circular orbit. Start 400 km above Earth. At 7.669 km/s, the two-body model gives a circular orbit with a 92.56 minute period. Speed and distance are linked by v = √(μ/r).

Change velocity. At mission time 0, execute a 100 m/s transverse burn in the direction of motion. Position stays fixed. The added velocity increases orbital energy and changes the path to an ellipse.

Check the result. The burn point stays at 400 km altitude. Apoapsis rises to 765.5 km. A separate vis-viva calculation predicts 765.5 km. The spacecraft slows as it climbs toward apoapsis.

Test the model. These results assume one spherical central body and an instantaneous burn. Earth’s equatorial bulge changes the gravity field. How long does the simpler prediction remain close enough? Compare both models using the same initial state and a stated distance threshold.

Predicted and simulated apoapsis differ by 2.73e-12 km. That agreement checks this two-body calculation; it does not validate a complete real-world force model.

Watch the film

The same experiment in an 80-second captioned film. Positions are generated from the simulator; playback compresses orbital time.

Read the video transcript · Read the case study